Graduate Students Held to be Employees - NLRB Rules Bargaining Group


Todays' post is shared from the NYTimes.com

Punctuating a string of Obama-era moves to shore up labor rights and expand protections for workers, the National Labor Relations Board ruled Tuesday that students who work as teaching and research assistants at private universities have a federally backed right to unionize.


The case arose from a petition filed by a group of graduate students at Columbia University, who are seeking to win recognition for a union that will allow them a say over such issues as the quality of their health insurance and the timeliness of stipend payments.

Click here to read the entire article

Download the decision here
364 NLRB No. 90 COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 08/23/2016 02-RC-143012
Mental health in the workplace: Health in the American Workplace Highlight

Mental health in the workplace: Health in the American Workplace Highlight

Experts take on the concerns most expressed by American employees in a poll done by NPR, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. The panelists also describe lessons learned from employers that cultivate healthy environments – to see if there are feasible measures to produce a more accessible, supportive, healthier workplace.

 Click here for You-Tube Video link.

Related Articles:


Mar 18, 2013 ... Stress claims have been permitted under most of nations' workers' ... 1974, compensable mental injuries were limited to post-traumatic injuries, ...
idoctor-health.blogspot.com
Jul 6, 2012 ... Workers' Compensation claims have been increasing for mental stress claims as technology evolves and more workers are feeling more ...
idoctor-health.blogspot.com

Jul 5, 2016 ... Researchers wanted to see if they could identify risk factors that made people more likely to suffer post-traumatic stress (PTSD) or major ...
idoctor-health.blogspot.com

Stress in the Workplace: The Availability of Workers' Compensation Benefits

Compensability for occupational diseases has become commonplace in most, if not all, jurisdictions throughout the country; however, the majority of claims filed allege physical rather than mental disability. The California Workers' Compensation Institute recently published their study of mental stress claims which indicated an increase of 430 percent in the number of claims filed from 1980 to 1986. 

NIOSH to Hold Meeting on Motor Vehicle Safety

NIOSH to Hold Meeting on Motor Vehicle Safety

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) is seeking input on the progress and future direction of its Center for Motor Vehicle Safety
to ensure that the program is:

(1) addressing goals outlined in the NIOSH Center for Motor Vehicle Safety: Strategic Plan for Research and Prevention, 2014-2018 http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2014-122/pdfs/2014-122.pdf; and

(2) meeting stakeholder needs; and

(3) working effectively toward its overarching purpose of preventing work-related crashes and injuries.

Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of work-related injury deaths in the United States. Millions of workers drive or ride in a motor vehicle as part of their jobs. The risk affects workers in all industries and occupations, whether they drive heavy or light vehicles on the job.

Between 2003 and 2014, 22,000 workers died in work-related motor vehicle crashes. In 2013 alone, motor vehicle crashes at work cost U.S. employers $25 billion—$65,000 per nonfatal injury and $671,000 per death.

NIOSH is the only U.S. federal agency whose mission encompasses prevention of work-related motor vehicle crashes and resulting injuries for all worker populations. Since 2014, the NIOSH Center for Motor Vehicle Safety has followed a 5-year strategic plan for research and prevention to work toward meeting five strategic goals.

Topics will include:

1. What research should NIOSH consider pursuing during the remaining period covered by the NIOSH Center for Motor Vehicle Safety: Strategic Plan for Research and Prevention, 2014-2018?

2. What research should NIOSH begin planning to initiate beyond 2018?

3. Are there additional external research partners NIOSH should work with?

4. What specific resources or tools are most urgently needed to move prevention of work-related crashes forward?

5. What audience(s) for workplace crash-prevention information should NIOSH prioritize in planning its communication strategy?

6. What are your organization's preferred digital communication channels for receiving workplace crash-prevention information (e.g.,email, social media, eNewsletter, Web page)?

7. How have you or your organization used information from the NIOSH Center for Motor Vehicle Safety? Of particular interest is information on changes made in workplace motor vehicle safety programs based on research results and/or communication materials and the impact of those changes.

For information about the NIOSH Center for Motor Vehicle Safety, visit www.cdc.gov/niosh/motorvehicle.

For information about Center for Motor Vehicle Safety progress towards meeting strategic goals, see the following supporting documents in http://www.regulations.gov:

⁃ NIOSH Center for Motor Vehicle Safety: Strategic Plan for Research and Prevention, 2014-2018; NIOSH Center for Motor Vehicle Safety:

⁃ Progress Report 2016 http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/motorvehicle/pdfs/progressreport.pdf 

- NIOSH Center for Motor Vehicle Safety: Performance Measures http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/motorvehicle/pdfs/performancemeasures.pdf.

NIOSH will hold a public web meeting on September 14, 2016 from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, to allow for comments on future directions for the NIOSH Center for Motor Vehicle Safety. Attendance to this public web meeting is first come, first served.

Confirm your attendance to this web meeting by sending an email to rolsavsky@cdc.gov with the subject line “Attendance: Public web meeting” by September 1, 2016. An email confirming registration will be sent from NIOSH and will include details needed to participate.

Related Articles:
Jul 28, 2015 ... U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx announced today that Fiat Chrysler Automobiles has acknowledged violations of the Motor Vehicle ...
idoctor-health.blogspot.com
Mar 15, 2014 ... On March 6, 2014 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) determined that a potential defect relating to motor vehicle safety exists in the fuel pump of ...
idoctor-health.blogspot.com
Sep 17, 2014 ... ... seeks damages for wrongly terminated employee who made safety ... agency, consumer product, motor vehicle safety, railroad, maritime, ...
idoctor-health.blogspot.com
NJ Firm Cited for OSHA Violations - National Manufacturing Co.

NJ Firm Cited for OSHA Violations - National Manufacturing Co.

National Manufacturing Co. exposes workers to chemical hazards,
workplace safety dangers at North Jersey facility

Flash fires at company lead to inspections, $56K in fines for 10 OSHA violations
Employer name: National Manufacturing Co. Inc.
Inspection site: 12 River Road, Chatham, New Jersey
Citations issued: The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration issued citations for 10 serious safety violations on July 25, 2016.

Investigation findings: Borough of Chatham officials alerted OSHA after a flash fire burned an employee as the worker cleaned a degreasing tank at National Manufacturing on Jan. 29, 2016. The agency initiated a safety inspection on Feb. 1, 2016. The agency then opened a health inspection on Feb. 18, 2016, to evaluate chemical related health hazards after the safety inspection revealed the company's use of N-Propyl Bromide, also known as 1-Bromopropane, a chemical used to degrease metals, plastics and electronic and optical components.
Inspectors identified multiple workplace safety violations. They found the company:
  • Exposed employees to hazards related to N-Propyl Bromide.
  • Failed to provide fall protection for workers exposed to falls up to 7 feet.
  • Allowed electrical and housekeeping hazards.
  • Failed to medically evaluate and fit test employees using respirators.
Quote: "National Manufacturing Co. put workers in harm's way by not properly controlling chemical hazards at its facility in Chatham. We found the company's lack of effective hazard management relating to its degreasing system directly resulted in flash fires on Jan. 29 and Feb. 9, 2016, just 11 days apart," said Kris Hoffman, director of OSHA's Parsippany Area Office. "This company must do what's right to protect its workers and provide a safe and healthy workplace."
Proposed penalties: $56,300
The citations can be viewed at: http://www.osha.gov/ooc/citations/NationalManufacturing_1122937.pdf
http://www.osha.gov/ooc/citations/NationalManufacturing_1126715.pdf

Related Articles:
Mar 31, 2016 ... OSHA Settles with Anheuser-Busch of New Jersey - Warehouse ... 2014 for numerous safety violations at its Jersey City distribution warehouse.
idoctor-health.blogspot.com
Aug 8, 2016 ... OSHA fines South Jersey chemical facility $115K for exposing workers to flammable gas, other hazards; finds 3 repeat, 8 serious violations.
idoctor-health.blogspot.com
Mar 19, 2013 ... The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited Lieze Associates, doing business as Eagle Recycling ...
idoctor-health.blogspot.com
OSHA finds Clifton company again exposes employees to life-threatening falls

OSHA finds Clifton company again exposes employees to life-threatening falls

Employer name: Furia Roofing Co. Inc., 2 Monhegan St., Clifton, New Jersey
Inspection site: 699 Route 46 East, Teterboro, New Jersey
Citations issued: On Aug. 1, 2016, the U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration issued citations for one repeat and three serious violations.
Investigation findings: OSHA initiated an inspection on April 25, 2016, after a compliance officer observed Furia Roofing employees working on low slope roofs without fall protection and without effective fall protection, resulting in the repeat violations.
The serious violations relate to issues with fall protection equipment.
Quote: "Furia Roofing has repeatedly violated OSHA standards by failing to provide employees with fall protection and continuing to expose construction workers to serious injury or death. This failure to ensure worker safety indicates a problematic safety and health management system," said Lisa Levy, director of OSHA's Hasbrouck Heights Area Office. "OSHA will not tolerate this company continually endangering its workers. Furia should correct these hazards and implement an effective injury and illness prevention program for its workers."
Proposed penalties: $79,240
….
Jon L. Gelman of Wayne NJ is the author of NJ Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thomson-Reuters) and co-author of the national treatise, Modern Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thomson-Reuters). For over 4 decades the Law Offices of Jon L Gelman  1.973.696.7900  jon@gelmans.com  has been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.
OSHA fines South Jersey chemical facility $115K for exposing workers to flammable gas

OSHA fines South Jersey chemical facility $115K for exposing workers to flammable gas

OSHA fines South Jersey chemical facility $115K for exposing workers
to flammable gas, other hazards; finds 3 repeat, 8 serious violations
Employer name: Solvay Specialty Polymers USA LLC
Inspection site: 10 Leonard Lane, West Deptford, New Jersey

Citations issued: On August 1, 2016, the U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration issued citations to the employer for three repeat and eight serious safety violations.
Investigation findings: As part of the agency's national emphasis program for chemical facilities, OSHA inspected the company on Feb. 6, 2016, and found multiple violations of federal process safety management regulations, including not developing set written procedures for maintaining process equipment, which resulted in repeat violations.
In addition, OSHA issued citations for serious violations for the following:
  • Having incomplete process safety information for equipment in the process.
  • Failing to review operating procedures to comply with current operating practice.
  • Failing to inspect and test process equipment.
  • Failing to follow established procedures to manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and/or facilities.
  • Failing to respond properly to a compliance audit.
Quote: "Our inspectors focused on vinylidene fluoride, a liquified flammable gas manufactured and used at Solvay Specialty Polymers' chemical facility. This gas poses serious safety and health risks to this company's employees, including fire and explosion hazards, frostbite, skin and lung irritation, and liver damage associated with chronic exposures. An effective process safety management program is needed to protect workers and prevent the catastrophic release of highly hazardous chemicals," said Paula Dixon-Roderick, director of OSHA's Marlton Area Office.
Proposed penalties: $115,000
OSHA finds New Jersey rifle manufacturer deemed a 'severe violator' exposes workers to noise hazards

OSHA finds New Jersey rifle manufacturer deemed a 'severe violator' exposes workers to noise hazards

OSHA finds New Jersey rifle manufacturer deemed a 'severe violator' in 2012
continues to expose workers to noise hazards at Bayonne facility

Henry RAC Holding Corp. fined $45K for federal violations
Employer name: Henry RAC Holding Corp.
Inspection site: Henry RAC Holding Corp.
Citations issued: On July 29, 2016, the U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration issued citations for three repeat, four serious and one other-than-serious safety violations.
Investigation findings: OSHA initiated the inspection on Feb. 23, 2016, as a follow-up to a 2012 inspection which resulted in Henry RAC Holding Corp. being placed in the agency's Severe Violator Enforcement Program.
Inspectors found the company failed to maintain an effective hearing conservation program for employees exposed to high noise levels during polishing and test-firing operations to prevent permanent hearing loss and failed to provide workers with annual training on noise hazards. OSHA also found the company did not follow up on incidents where employees experienced significant hearing loss.
Quote: "Henry RAC Holding Corp.'s owner's manual states that ear protection should be worn while shooting its rifles. Yet, the company continues to fail to provide its workers with the proper safeguards needed to prevent noise-induced hearing loss," said Kris Hoffman, director at OSHA's Parsippany Area Office. "Hearing loss is a serious issue. This employer's callous attitude toward hearing protection is unconscionable and will not be tolerated."
Proposed penalties: $45,000
Wisconsin shipyard faces nearly $1.4M in OSHA penalties for exposing workers to lead, and other hazards

Wisconsin shipyard faces nearly $1.4M in OSHA penalties for exposing workers to lead, and other hazards

OSHA finds workers exposed to lead at levels up to 20 times the permissible exposure limit

SUPERIOR, Wis. - Federal health inspectors found Fraser Shipyards Inc. overexposed workers to lead during the retrofitting of a ship's engine room. The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration's sampling results determined 14 workers had lead levels up to 20 times the exposure limit. The agency also found workers exposed to other heavy metals.


On July 29, 2016, OSHA proposed $1,395,000 in penalties for the Wisconsin shipyard operator. The agency cited 14 willful egregious health violations for each instance of overexposing a worker to lead. OSHA also cited five additional willful violations for failing to conduct monitoring to assess employee exposure to lead, failing to implement a lead compliance program or a respiratory protection program for lead and for failing to provide training on lead and asbestos hazards.

The agency also issued 10 serious violations to the company, and placed Fraser Shipyards in its Severe Violator Enforcement Program for failing to address safety and health hazards.

Interlake Steamship Company of Middleburg Heights, Ohio, contracted Fraser to modernize the Herbert C. Jackson under a $10 million contract. OSHA opened the February 2016 health inspection after receiving multiple complaints of unsafe working conditions.

"Fraser Shipyards accepted a contract with a very low profit margin and penalties for delayed completion, but could not meet the schedule without endangering its workers. This employer was unwilling to pay the necessary costs to protect employees from lead exposure," said Dr. David Michaels, assistant secretary of labor for Occupational Safety and Health. "When companies prioritize profits and deadlines over the health and safety of their workforce, it is the workers who pay the price. Law-breaking employers must be held accountable for their unlawful behavior. "

The agency determined Fraser Shipyards' management knew of the presence of lead and asbestos throughout the vessel. Built in 1959, the ship arrived at the shipyards in December 2015 for a six-month retrofit project. The contract required the company to meet specific deadlines to get the vessel back in service for the summer iron ore shipping season.

"Fraser ignored federal regulations, its own corporate safety manuals and worker concerns," said Ken Atha, OSHA's regional administrator in Chicago. "Such behavior is unacceptable. No worker should be put at risk from exposure to hazards that can cause permanent health issues to meet a contract deadline."

Overexposure to lead can lead to brain damage, as well as gastrointestinal effects, anemia and kidney disease. During its investigation, OSHA conducted personal and bulk sampling in February and March 2016, and found 14 employees were overexposed to lead. The company later conducted blood lead level testing of more than 120 additional employees that showed more than 75 percent of those tested had elevated blood lead levels.

Investigators also found Fraser failed to identify and inform employees of the presence, location and quantity of asbestos containing materials and or presumed asbestos containing material despite having a written asbestos compliance program. They also determined employees performed demolition in several areas of the ship including cutting into piping and equipment, but Fraser did not make workers aware of presence of asbestos in areas where these activities took place. Exposure to asbestos increases the risk of lung cancer and mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the lungs and abdomen.

OSHA inspectors also found Fraser exposed workers to iron oxide, arsenic, hexavalent chromium, cadmium and lead hazards while performing torch-cutting and welding procedures because the company failed to provide adequate respiratory and personal protective equipment to limit their exposure to these harmful substances. Fraser also failed to conduct required medical evaluations and exposure monitoring for employees.

The agency also found that Fraser failed to:
Follow respiratory protection requirements, including fit-testing employees, properly cleaning and storing respirators, and training employees on respirator use.
Train workers on arsenic, cadmium, and hexavalent chromium hazards.
Protect workers from cumulative overexposures to heavy metals and overexposures to iron oxide.
Enroll employees exposed to lead in a medical surveillance program.
Conduct monitoring to assess employee exposure to arsenic, cadmium, and hexavalent chromium.
Provide fall protection.

View current citations here.

This is not first time federal inspectors have found workplace hazards at Fraser. OSHA cited the shipyards for exposing workers to asbestos hazards in 2000 and for multiple lead violations in 1993. Since 1972, the agency has inspected Fraser 28 times. The workers' compensation carrier for Fraser is Arch Insurance Company in Jersey City, New Jersey.

At the time of the 2016 inspection, Fraser had a seasonal workforce of about 190 employees. The International Brotherhood of Boilermakers from Locals #107 in Milwaukee, #117 in Superior and #647 in Minneapolis represent many of the workers. Established in 1889, Fraser offers full shipyard services at its facility on Lake Superior. Capstan Corporation, a holding company based in Duluth, Minnesota, owns the shipyards.

The company has 15 business days from receipt of its citations and penalties to comply, request an informal conference with OSHA's area director, or contest the findings before the independentOccupational Safety and Health Review Commission.